Upfront Home
In This Issue
News and Trends
Features
 • 
 • 
 • 
 • 
Times Past
The Ethicist
Debate
Teen Voices
Upfront Topics
Contact
Magazine Info

A Revolutionary Recession

Did a Sour Economy Set Off the American War for Independence?

By Tim Arango


When Benjamin Franklin returned to America in 1762 after almost five years in London, he was shocked at the housing prices. "The expense of living is greatly advanced in my absence," he commented. "Rent of old houses, and value of lands . . . are trebled in the past six years."

Franklin, it seems, had come home to a real-estate bubble. It eventually burst, as all real estate bubbles do, bringing on a credit crunch and a deep recession that was the economic backdrop to the American Revolution.

The parallels between the current economy and the one Franklin experienced have historians reassessing how much of a role economics, as opposed to ideas, played in the Revolution.

"I think there's reason to doubt the Revolution would have happened as it did if it weren't for these economic conditions," says Ronald W. Michener, an economics professor at the University of Virginia.

Michener's views are a radical departure from the popular notion that the Revolution was primarily a product of grand ideas about self-government, the kind embodied in the poetic prose of Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence.

Big, unexpected things always happen during times of economic stress: A year ago, who would have predicted a Republican administration would spend billions of dollars to bail out entire industries?

Economic conditions have certainly played a central role in other revolutions throughout history. The political unrest that set off the French Revolution in 1789 was heightened by high unemployment and soaring food prices. World War I bankrupted Russia and set the stage for the Communist Revolution: After the collapse of the czarist regime in 1917, Vladimir Lenin and the Bolsheviks (later called Communists) ultimately took power with promises of "bread, peace, and land" to war-weary peasants and factory workers.

As with most downturns, America's colonial recession was preceded by an economic boom. During the height of the French and Indian War, which lasted from 1754 until 1763, money flooded into the Colonies, especially New York, where the British Army was headquartered. All that cash sloshing around resulted in lavish displays of wealth—notably by British officers.

Colonial Foreclosures

Housing prices soared during the war. But when credit tightened afterward, those who could not pay their debts lost their land. John Morton, the sheriff of Chester County, Pennsylvania, and a signer of the Declaration of Independence, seized 180 farms between 1766 and 1769.

Michener and historian Robert W. Wright of New York University, who are writing a book about the economy and the American Revolution, maintain that these nasty economic circumstances produced the anger that found expression in rebellion against the Stamp Act and other British taxes, leading to the split with England. Other historians think that's overstating things.

"There was a great deal of instability, but that is hardly an explanation for the Revolution," says Gordon S. Wood, a historian at Brown University in Rhode Island. "I don't think you can make a strong argument for an economic interpretation of the Revolution."

Wood argues that while the colonists' response to the revolutionary cause was partly related to economic circumstances, democratic ideas had been percolating for years and came to the fore only after actions by the British—for example, the Stamp Act of 1765, which imposed the first direct tax on American colonists and is widely considered to have triggered the rebellion.

But Wright and Michener believe that had British economic policy been different, and had the recession been shorter, the United States might have gained its independence gradually, much as Canada did—over the course of more than a century, beginning in the 1860s.

"We're not trying to replace the ideological view," Wright says. "We're saying that we have an important piece of the puzzle."

Edward Countryman, a historian at Southern Methodist University in Texas, agrees that the personalities and ideas of the Founding Fathers may sometimes overshadow other important developments of the period.

"You walk into Barnes & Noble and there's all these great big books on Franklin, Jefferson," he says. "By and large these authors are discounting any attempt to take into account social experience."

Of course, there are key differences between 1776 and today, as well as parallels.

"We are having a serious economic crisis right now," Wood says, "but no one is talking about revolution."